2014-04-29 17:53 GMT+02:00 Garret Wilson <[email protected]>: > On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:06:39 AM UTC-7, Lukas Eder wrote: >> >> ... Now. While you obviously don't agree with these arguments ... >> > > Far from it! I've used ObjectPascal since back in the Borland Delphi 1.0 > days, and its ability to define a property with separate accessor methods > influenced the development of the same thing in C#. The "get" and "set" > method pattern is clunky. Five minutes after waking up this morning I > simply found it humorous that someone wanted to have a "getter" without > "get". >
OK, fair enough ;-) > My larger point is that the library should default to convention with the > option for configuration, and I think my proposal for > <fieldProperty>addresses that concern. Thanks for considering it! Have a > productive day. > Thanks, you too! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
