Hi,
Using Jooq 3.6.1, In a situation similar to the following:
<type> a = Tables.A.as("a");
<type> b = Tables.B.as("b");
Record record = ... .select(a.name, b.name) ...
record.getValue(Tables.B.name) was returning the value fetched for a.name.
I know it doesn't make sense that the code was using aliases during the
select and not during getValue - however I feel it would be a good safety
measure for jooq to not match anything at all in this case, or ideally
throw an exception.
I haven't checked the result using Jooq 3.6.2 but the changelog doesn't
seem to list anything relevant to this situation.
Cheers,
Dave
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
