The document shepherd Karen O'Donoghue and I completed a review of all the IESG 
comments in the IETF data tracker today in preparation for the drafts going to 
the RFC Editor.  This set of drafts addresses all the remaining comments that 
we thought should be dealt with in the final documents.  The only changes were:

*        Clarified the definitions of UTF8(STRING) and ASCII(STRING).

*        Stated that "line breaks are for display purposes only" in places 
where this disclaimer was needed and missing.

*        Updated the WebCrypto reference to refer to the W3C Candidate 
Recommendation.

Unless additional issues are identified soon, these should be the drafts that 
go to the RFC Editor.

The specifications are available at:

*        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-40

*        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-40

*        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-40

*        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-40

HTML formatted versions are available at:

*        http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-40.html

*        
http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-40.html

*        http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-40.html

*        
http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-40.html

                                                                -- Mike

P.S.  This notice was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1318 and as 
@selfissued.


_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to