Thank you. I'll double check the IESG comments to make sure they were addressed, then progress the drafts.
Best regards, Kathleen Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 13, 2015, at 9:00 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > The document shepherd Karen O’Donoghue and I completed a review of all the > IESG comments in the IETF data tracker today in preparation for the drafts > going to the RFC Editor. This set of drafts addresses all the remaining > comments that we thought should be dealt with in the final documents. The > only changes were: > · Clarified the definitions of UTF8(STRING) and ASCII(STRING). > · Stated that “line breaks are for display purposes only” in places > where this disclaimer was needed and missing. > · Updated the WebCrypto reference to refer to the W3C Candidate > Recommendation. > > Unless additional issues are identified soon, these should be the drafts that > go to the RFC Editor. > > The specifications are available at: > · http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-40 > · http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-40 > · http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-40 > · http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-40 > > HTML formatted versions are available at: > · > http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-40.html > · > http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-40.html > · http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-40.html > · > http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-40.html > > -- Mike > > P.S. This notice was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1318 and as > @selfissued. > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
