I don't know when it needs to be done, but the other down reference in the document is also an algorithm document which I hope will get into the registry as well when it is published.
Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:16 PM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Jim Schaad <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: (with > COMMENT) > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I note that the reference to RFC7748 is a normative downref that does not > appear to be mentioned in the last call announcement. It’s not in the downref > registry, but since it's an algorithm spec, it probably should be. I don't > suggest > any particular course of action; I merely bring it up in case people hadn't > already > noticed. > _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
