On 16 Aug 2016, at 21:43, Jim Schaad wrote:
I don't know when it needs to be done, but the other down reference in
the document is also an algorithm document which I hope will get into
the registry as well when it is published.
I agree . I didn't call that out because that one _was_ mentioned in the
last call announcement.
Thanks,
Ben.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:16 PM
To: The IESG <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Jim Schaad
<[email protected]>;
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on
draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: (with
COMMENT)
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory
paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I note that the reference to RFC7748 is a normative downref that does
not
appear to be mentioned in the last call announcement. It’s not in
the downref
registry, but since it's an algorithm spec, it probably should be. I
don't suggest
any particular course of action; I merely bring it up in case people
hadn't already
noticed.
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
