Both versions work ok for me. As suggested earlier, if you have an example online, I'm sure it can be debugged.
2009/1/21 Daniel Friesen <[email protected]> > > I can't see why the code would behave that way (I can't see anything in > .clean that explicitly checks for an alt), however it is worth noting > that in (X)HTML the alt tag on an image is a required attribute, > technically it could be considered legal behavior if the img tag was > rejected if it was missing that. > > ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://nadir-seen-fire.com] > -Nadir-Point (http://nadir-point.com) > -Wiki-Tools (http://wiki-tools.com) > -MonkeyScript (http://monkeyscript.nadir-point.com) > -Animepedia (http://anime.wikia.com) > -Narutopedia (http://naruto.wikia.com) > -Soul Eater Wiki (http://souleater.wikia.com) > > Jörn Zaefferer wrote: > > One adds an alt attribute, the other a title attribute instead. > > > > Jörn > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:53 PM, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Umm - both of your examples are identical? Do you have an example > online? > >> > >> --John > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:01 PM, TMQuinn <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> This works: > >>> nextTag = $("<img src='image.gif' alt='value' />"); > >>> nextTag.bind('click', clickMe); > >>> > >>> This Fails: > >>> nextTag = $("<img src='image.gif' title='value' />"); > >>> nextTag.bind('click', clickMe); > >>> > >>> with a no such method error. Should I submit this to the Bug Tracker? > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
