OK... fine for me... but doesn't IE7 have its own XMLHttpRequest implementation, for example? I thought it did...
Anyway, the worst part is getting rid of IE6, because the majority of the users who use IE7 leave automatic update on on their Windows boxes... as soon as IE8 pops out in the automatic updates, we'll see a huge jump in market share from IE8... Diogo On Jun 5, 11:16 am, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't think of a single thing that we could remove from jQuery that > wouldn't also affect IE 7.0. The JavaScript and DOM implementations in > IE 6 and 7 are virtually identical - and because of that there's > really no reason for us to stop actively supporting IE 6 (at least not > until both 6 and 7 are dead - who knows when that will be). > > --John > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Diogo Baeder <diogobae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > What do you guys think of preparing the next versions of jQuery for > > IE6's death, when its use comes below, say, 0,5%, putting comments next > > to the methods? For example: > > > // TODO: Remove upon IE6's death > > > I mean, it would be great to remove all those workarounds we have to use > > only for IE6, like ActiveXObject... or am I wrong? > > > Regards, > > > Diogo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
