Yep, it loads the file into memory, it is the only way to create the proper boundary to send. Maybe for such massive file an ftp is more appropriated.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:07 PM, matas <matas.petri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've tested it on my server uploading 140mb file, SF4 is perfect but > FF3.5 started beachballing after file selection. It seems to load the > whole file into memory, the same problem like the Flash FileReference > Class :( > > > On Jul 15, 5:30 pm, Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The size does not matter that much, the problem is bandwidth and server > > capability to receive 100Mb .... that server does not accept such amount > in > > any case and IE progress is fake so with massive files will be almost > > useless but there is nothing we can do. At least the progress in IE case > > will not be static, files after file ;-) > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:26 PM, matas <matas.petri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > wow! great stuff, Andrea! > > > > > have you tested it with large (> 100mb) files too? > > > > > Thanks, > > > Matas > > > > > On Jul 15, 3:24 pm, Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > If interested, my most complete I've done so far is noSWFUpload, > > > compatible > > > > with FF3, 3.5, Safari 4, IE, Opera, waiting for Chrome (they are half > way > > > > compatible since they solved the zero length in > > > input.files.item(0).length > > > > whatever file was it). > > > > > >http://code.google.com/p/noswfupload/ > > > > > > demo:http://www.3site.eu/noswfupload/ > > > > > > on github (kangax should have a fork about it) > > >http://github.com/WebReflection/noSWFUpload/tree/master > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:38 PM, matas <matas.petri...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > also similar Safari4 optimized code by Andrea: > > > > > > > > http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2009/03/safari-4-multiple-upload-wi. > > > .. > > > > > > > Matas > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 1:35 pm, Jörn Zaefferer <joern.zaeffe...@googlemail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hey Mike, any plans on incorporating XHR upload into the form > upload, > > > > > > with a fallback to iframe upload? > > > > > > > > Seehttp:// > > > > > hacks.mozilla.org/2009/06/xhr-progress-and-richer-file-uploadi... > > > > > > > > Would be interesting to extend the form plugin API with a > progress > > > > > > callback, which gets called just once (on success) for the iframe > > > > > > fallback. > > > > > > > > Jörn > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
