This is a very smart strategy, never aware of that. I think I can benefit a lot from it. Thanks for mentioning!
On Oct 24, 2:23 am, Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Scott, almost everything fine ... > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > So the only thing left is the actual definition of "ext". Nothing to > > it, right? :-) > > extend > > Note that the re-use of the name ext in this declaration is not > > > necessary. > > named functions are good for debugging purpose while repeated words are > almost meaningless, size speaking, for gzipped code > > About the other question, it's almost the same except I use a bedgeObject > strategy avoiding a for in loop relying the Object.clone emulator (so 1 for > in for the object rather than 2 as you did, not a big deal in any case) > > Regards --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
