On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:22 PM, xwisdom <xwis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
>> $(context).delegate('li:even, li:odd', 'click', callback)
>> $(context).delegate('li' 'click.namespace', callback)
Actually, the more I think about it, the more I think that this is
still more readable:
$(context).delegate('click', 'li', callback [, data])
because it can be comfortably read as
"In context, delegate click events on "LI" elements to callback
[using data].
That readability is extremely beneficial.
And I don't think there is a need to skip the selector. What
advantage does this:
$(context).delegate('click', callback)
have over these:
$(context).click(callback)
$(context).bind('click', callback)
? If there is none, perhaps there is no reason to allow it.
> I've also being thinking about using a "|" instead of a ":"
>
> $(context).delegate('li |click', data, callback)
That's certainly preferable to ":", but I still like these alternate
syntaxes better.
> or just use a space:
>
> $(context).delegate('li click', data, callback)
That seems problematic. What happens in an XML document that includes
a <click> element inside an "li" one? It starts to get hairy.
In any case, what do you think of
$(context).delegate(event, selector, callback [, data])
?
-- Scott
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=.
