Forgot to add my example link: http://education.llnl.gov/jQuery/ajax.html
Click auto complete (unknown if this is working at all in IE right now). Definitely in FF. Your plugin is the second example. On 4/30/07 2:35 PM, "Shelane Enos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, a few other issues. > > If the default caching is set at 10 and matcheSubset default is true, why is > it making a second call to the server when I add a new letter. > > First input: cap > Additional letter: i > > Then a new query goes out to the server: > http://education.llnl.gov/jQuery/pages/lookup.lasso?q=capi&limit=50 > > Second question: is there a way I can do max all? It seems counter > intuitive if caching is used. Unless it's set so that if caching is used, > only the final output is limited. > > Third question: I have seen a few examples out there including these params: > highlight: false, > highlight: function(value) { > //alert(value); > return value; > }, > > But I don't see anything documenting these (in your documentation online). > > Thanks. > > On 4/30/07 2:05 PM, "Shelane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Jörn, >> >> I believe I found a bug in the new autocompleter. Line 157 has: >> var $input = $(input).attr("autocomplete", >> "off").addClass(options.inputClass); >> >> This throws a javascript error if jQuery.noConflict() has been called: >> $(input).attr is not a function >> >> changing it to var $input = jQuery(input).attr("autocomplete", >> "off").addClass(options.inputClass); >> >> fixes the problem >> >> On Apr 19, 11:08 am, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Dan G. Switzer, II schrieb:>> What would be passed to the function? The >>> containing li? a jQuery object >>>>> containing the containing li? The HTML text? >>> >>>> The source is available here: >>>> http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/plugins/autocomplete/jquery.autoc... >>>> .js >>> >>>> [...] >>> >>>> At the moment it runs against li.innerHTML. >>> >>> So far it was internal only, I'd pass the formatted string as the first >>> argument and the other stuff in addition. >>> Formatting would be very flexible then. Default takes a simple string >>> and adds simple highlighting. Then you can replace that simple string >>> with some custom formatting and default highlighting. Or you use >>> formatting and include highlighting and switch off default >>> highlighting... I hope we really need that degree. >>> >>> Ah, and thanks Dan for the regex and the link, I'll test that. >>> >>> -- >>> Jörn Zaefferer >>> >>> http://bassistance.de >> >> >> > >
