That's a much better result, and more what I might expect. jQuery came in 3rd (1175) after Ext (585) and dojo (736).
_____ From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin Sterling Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 11:43 AM To: jquery-en Subject: [jQuery] follow up on real world speed test Hey guys and gals, Not sure if this is beating a dead horse, but per my suggestion on an earlier post, I decided to take a real site and using the "SlickSpeed Selector Test," and test it out. I took the html from today's digg.com home page and changed the selectors to match it's content. I also added some full path selectors because I really did not know what would be faster, those are located toward the bottom of the list. With my new selectors, the test takes a bit longer, from start to finish it took about 2min 20 sec. I personally still don't get the li[class|=di], li[class~=digg-it], li[class*=igg], li[class$=it], li[class^=digg], I read the http://docs.jquery.com/Selectors page, but still don't get the full benefit of using them. Maybe someone can explain this to me. If anything, this at least shows me how I should be coding my jquery for faster dom selections. Link to speed test: http://www.kenzomedia.com/speedtest/ Link to page being tested: http://www.kenzomedia.com/speedtest/template.html -- Benjamin Sterling http://www.KenzoMedia.com http://www.KenzoHosting.com
