[jQuery] Re: Naming Conventions

[Felix Geisendörfer]

I like it simple: [x] .mask [  ] .maskInput -- Felix -------------------------- My latest blog posts: My Business: http://www.fg-webdesign.de Josh Bush wrote: As my masked input plugin approaches 1.0, I'm noticing that my plugin isn't following the conventions of the jQuery library itself. Currently my plugins main method is .maskedinput(mask,options) I'm thinking I should change it to .maskInput(mask,options) or simpley .mask(mask,options) I think this change is good because it's a verb and it shows action. Also, there is a global method which allows user defined char placeholders which Jörn advided me to namespace off. So, I plan to put it in $.MaskedInput.addPlaceholder(character,regex). What do you all think of the proposed name changes? I think it's important to remain consistent with the base library. I want to make sure that I get everything settled once I reach 1.0. Thanks Josh digitalbush.com