Ext has this http://extjs.com/deploy/ext/docs/output/Ext.Fx.html which
is pretty much all one can ask for.
John, I know jQuery support Ext but I would like to use jQuery for my
current project. Ext is just too big and I don't want to build a new
Ext download every time the clients wants more features, for that
jQuery is perfect with its extensible architecture (and tiny tiny
footprint).
On 5 Jul., 02:20, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you realize that you can do this now? There's already a .animate()
> function, you don't need any of the 1.2 functionality for that.
>
> SlideDown: .animate({ height: 'show' });
> SlideUp: .animate({ height: 'hide });
> SlideRight: .animate({ width: 'show' });
> SlideLeft: .animate({ width: 'hide' });
>
> --John
>
> On 7/4/07, Jon Ege Ronnenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
>
> > I like jQuery a lot and have used it in couple projects now. But one thing I
> > really don't get is the "slideUp" and "slideDown" functions. Why can't I
> > decide which way the animation goes?? I really think they (the functions)
> > should be more generic. While browsing the road map for jQuery 1.2 I saw the
> > Relative Animations section which is exactly what I want. It would be
> > obvious if slideUp/slideDown uses this new method but wouldn't be nice if
> > there where a shorthand to achieve this?
> > I propose slideUp/slideDown(string
> > /number, string direction); where direction can be "up", "right", "down" or
> > "left".
> > For now I'll settle with animate and some CSS mumbo jumbo.
>
> > Anyway, thanks for your time - you took to read this :-)
