Basically, I'm wondering if something like this is feasible:
if ( (type == "" && !!z || type == "=" && z == m[5] || type == "!=" && z != m[5] || type == "^=" && z && !z.indexOf(m[5]) || type == "$=" && z.substr(z.length - m[5].length) == m[5] || (type == "*=" || type == "~=") && z.indexOf(m[5]) >= 0) ^ not ) { tmp.push( a ); } else { // Check jQuery.expr["@"] for custom attribute selectors } On 7/5/07, Diego A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to help but you've lost me there Aaron... Is it possible to attach an "else" to the "if" statement that replaced > it[1] that checks in [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 05/07/07, Aaron Heimlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/5/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, this was a really unfortunate change that had to be made. We > > really wanted to keep the extensible functionality of [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it > > ended up being just to incredibly slow. Moving all of the code > > internal was the only way to receive any sort of speed up. Sorry about > > > > that guys. > > > > --John > > > Is it possible to attach an "else" to the "if" statement that replaced > it[1] that checks in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [1] > http://dev.jquery.com/browser/tags/1.1.3.1/src/selector/selector.js#L345 > > > -- > Aaron Heimlich > Web Developer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://aheimlich.freepgs.com > > >
-- Aaron Heimlich Web Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://aheimlich.freepgs.com