Well i have to think about that, but i might do some releasing of
code. The advantage i have, is that it runs on my own servers, so i
get to choose the owner ;)

On 21 jul, 09:14, "Jon Ege Ronnenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you load the script, has nothing to do with the dom. The script can
> modify/alter the dom but the loading sequence is a completely new story. If
> you use the jQuery ready() method, your script will be processed right after
> the dom is loaded and before the images are loaded, which is what you want
> if you want to alter the dom, but don't care about images being shown when
> you do it.
> The scripts you want to put in after the body is script that are not run
> before the user interacts. That does not include behaviors, because you want
> them to work as soon the user e.g. clicks an element (and he/she can do that
> as soon as the page render).
> IMHO you're better of gzipping your files (and of course minimize them) and
> don't put more library (i.e. scripts) than you need.
>
> On 7/17/07, Michael Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > > My understanding is we put script tags in the head so as to not
> > > > > clutter up the body DOM. I don't think it has anything to do with
> > > > > ready(), and I'm pretty sure ready() doesn't require
> > > > > script tags to be in the head...
>
> > > > Yes, but if you put the scripts at the end of the body you don't need
> > > > to use ready(), e.g. that is literally the same as using ready()...
>
> > > So why don't we just always put script tags at the end of the body?
> > > What's the disadvantage of that?
>
> > One disadvantage is that it can lead to sloppy display behavior when the
> > page loads.
>
> > The browser will never start rendering a page while the HEAD is loading.
> > But
> > once it starts loading the BODY, the browser is free to render a partial
> > page any time it feels like it. In practice, this doesn't usually happen
> > unless something causes the page loading to stall. In particular, if there
> > is a script tag that loads an external script, the browser is very likely
> > to
> > render the page using whatever it has available at that point.
>
> > You can see this in action on any typical newspaper site such as
> >www.mercurynews.com. Any time you navigate to a new page, stuff jumps
> > around
> > all over the place while the page loads. This is caused by the script tags
> > that are sprinkled willy-nilly throughout the page.
>
> > A script tag at the very end of the body is less likely to trigger this
> > behavior, but it could still happen if the script modifies DOM elements
> > earlier in the page. The browser reaches the script tag, and while it
> > waits
> > for the external script to load it decides to render what it has so far.
> > Then the script loads and modifies the page, so things jump around when
> > this
> > happens.
>
> > -Mike

Reply via email to