i use IDEA for my server-side development... It is too good for java. I
noticed that it actually had pretty neat support for js and css as well. i
dont know how it compares to other IDEs made specifically for client side
development. But, when i last tried aptana, i didnt get much to leave my
cozy IDEA.

-GTG

On 8/1/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use WeBuilder 2007.  Jack Slocum had suggested checking out Idea
> IntelliJ last week at the conference.
>
> Glen
>
> On 8/1/07, Mark D. Lincoln < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Matt,
> >
> > I just discovered Spket IDE ( http://www.spket.com/).  It was
> > recommended by
> > someone on the Ext (http://extjs.com/) forums and so far, I would say it
> > is
> > great!  You can install it as a standalone application or as an Eclipse
> > plug-in.  Needless to say, you need Java installed (version 1.4.2 or
> > higher).  Spket currently supports Ext, jQuery, and YUI with features
> > like
> > code completion.  I tried Aptana a while ago and its support for jQuery
> > was
> > lacking at the time.  This may have changed, but since I found Spket, I
> > am
> > going to stick with it for a while.
> >
> > Mark D. Lincoln
> >
> > Mark D. Lincoln, Vice President of Product Development
> > Eye On Solutions, LLC
> > (866) 253-9366x101
> > www.eyeonsolutions.com
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Matt Penner
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:01 PM
> > To: jQuery (English)
> > Subject: [jQuery] Good Javascript editor or IDE?
> >
> >
> > I've just started developing with jQuery in the last month.  I usually
> > use VS 2005 or Notepad++ for my JavaScript.  It's features are pretty
> > much nil as far as intellisense goes.  Mainly all they do is syntax
> > highlighting and formatting.
> >
> > What recommendations on JavaScript editors or IDEs does anyone have?
> > Is there something sophisticated enough that can have intellisense
> > with jQuery or my own objects in external js files?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to