On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Sam Collett wrote:
It's good that they are using it quite a bit. There are some site that
use it, but only $(document).ready to call a function that manipulates
the DOM the old fashioned way.
Yeah, it makes me feel sorry for those people for all the time and
energy they're wasting.
I wonder, Why do I feel like a proud papa every time I see jQuery in
the wild? It's silly -- I haven't contributed a single line of code
and yet I had a big grin on my face looking through the .js files on
that site. I can only imagine how John feels. Must be a rush.
--Karl
_________________
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Sam Collett wrote:
It's good that they are using it quite a bit. There are some site that
use it, but only $(document).ready to call a function that manipulates
the DOM the old fashioned way.
On 4 Oct, 08:23, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow! Very awesome :-)
It looks like they're getting a pretty good coverage of features,
too.
(DOM Manipulation, animations, events, etc.)
--John
On 10/4/07, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like nbc.com is heavily into the jQuery love now, using
1.1.4.1 on
their site. Looks like they're using Interface and Mike Alsup's
Media
plugin, and Klaus Hartl's cookie plugin. Also, pulling in some
data with
$.ajax, doing some accordion stuff, etc.. They could be using the
This line appears in
http://www.nbc.com/assets/js/global/nbc.com.jsright after
all of the jQuery code:
// Legacy crap --------->
Pretty funny.
Here's another file you might want to poke around in:
http://www.nbc.com/assets/js/video/fun.js
--Karl
_________________
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
