On Oct 10, 12:17 am, hj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 9, 12:56 am, "R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 3:42 pm, Andy Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > <snip>> Yep, absolutely. If you have any ideas on how we could test a
> > browsers
> > > support for a selector without maintaining a hard coded list then I
> > > would love to hear them.
>
> > <snip>
>
> > $(document).ready(function () {
> > $('body').append(
> > '<div id="r_csstest"> \
> > <style type="text/css"> \
> > div#r_css{ \
> > width: 0px; \} \
>
> [and more like that]
>
> I hope you're aware of a couple of issues with this method:
I had typed from my memory. I think, in the original version, I
didn't hard-code the selector here (used from bc_selectors or so)
> 1) The <style> element is not a legal descendant of <body>.
> Better to append it to the <head>.
Since, it's only for the detection purpose, I think, this is good
(IMHO).
> 2) The ECMAScript standard doesn't define the "\" as a string
> continuation character.
> Better to simply concatenate string literals.
I didn't know that actually. Thanks for proving me with very useful
info.
--
<?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?>
Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/
