Hey Jason
That sounds perfect, thanks!
I'll try it out it now and report back if I've got more problems.
Thanks,
-Joel
On Oct 23, 7:26 pm, jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joel,
>
> Check out the LiveQuery plugin. It will handle the binding of the
> newly loaded elements for you automatically. So instead of including a
> new, redundant <script> element within each loaded HTML fragment (or
> rolling your own recursive binding functions), you can just do it once
> right on the main page and be done with it:
>
> $(function(){
> $('a').livequery('click', function(){
> $(this).parents('.cell').load('load.html');
> });
>
> });
>
> HTH,
> Jason
>
> On Oct 23, 6:17 pm, Joel S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Alex
>
> > Yes, I'm aware that I'm reloading some jQuery each time the page loads
> > (or reloads) in the DIV, but I don't know how else to get the jQuery
> > functionality within the loaded pages, since the loaded pages happen
> > after the main page's $(document).ready(function()... calls the
> > initial jQuery code.
>
> > Any ideas, anybody?
>
> > Thanks,
> > -Joel
>
> > On Oct 23, 3:14 am, dehneg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Joel,
>
> > > Very strange.
> > > I am very new with jQuery so I can not help you.
> > > But using firegug I can see that by clicking to load you are loading
> > > hundreds times the page.
> > > Hope this can help,
>
> > > Alex
>
> > > On Oct 23, 12:02 am, Joel S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi all
>
> > > > I'm fairly new to jQuery, but have been playing with it for a couple
> > > > months. This is my first post here.
>
> > > > I've got a page with a <table> where each cell has a div that gets
> > > > reloaded using load(). Each page that gets loaded into its cell also
> > > > needs to be able to reload -- preferably multiple/infinite times.
>
> > > > What I'm finding, however, is that after a few loads, the performance
> > > > degrades pretty significantly. Is this an unavoidable side-effect of
> > > > reloading jquery multiple times on the same page? Or is there a
> > > > better way to do this so that this doesn't happen?
>
> > > > I searched this list and found a thread from Sept '06 that said:
> > > > "multiple HTTP-Requests <snip> increases the overhead." Is that what
> > > > I'm up against?
>
> > > > WHAT I'VE GOT:
> > > > - On my main page:
> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > $(document).ready(function() {
> > > > $('a').click(function(){
> > > > $(this).parents(".cell").load("load.html");
> > > > });});
>
> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> > > > - My called/loaded page in its entirety is this:
> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > <p><a href="#">LOADED page</a></p>
> > > > <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
> > > > $('a').click(function(){
> > > > $(this).parents(".cell").load("load.html");
> > > > });
> > > > </script>
> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> > > > I've got a demo page if that would be helpful, at:
> > > > jsfmp<dotcom>/jquery/ajaxtable.html
>
> > > > TIA,
> > > > -Joel
