Eridius schrieb:
Another thing is there a reason why the class name are very generic?  This is
just an issue because a lot of those names are already used for other stuff
and is interfering with the current css.  is there a reason you did not use
something like validate_required, validate_email, etc...?  it not a big
deal, just whenever you upgrade the plug-in I will need to change all those
names again, no big deal, just annoying.
They are designed to match the style used by the webforms specification. There you have min and max attributes to validate values, with 1.2 you can use exactly the same style. Once webform gets implemented by browsers you could just check if that is available and let the browser handle the validation, without having to change your markup from some "proprietary" stuff to the standard.

You could also switch to a different validatin plugin, if that uses the same generic names instead of implementation specific ones.

Of course there is a cost to pay as you describe, but I hope thats worth it. After all, you don't have to use classes/attributes, metadata and plugin options are still an option.

Jörn

Reply via email to