But the demos are sloooooooow, even in Safari.
El 17/06/2008, a las 18:57, Josh Nathanson escribió: > > On the SproutCore site, it talks about it being a complete MVC type > framework. This is a different approach than jQuery. It reminded > me a bit of Spry. > > The SproutCore guy did a presentation at the SF Javascript Meetup a > couple of months ago, and it sounded pretty interesting. > > -- Josh > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: <jquery-en@googlegroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:54 AM > Subject: [jQuery] Re: SproutCore vs jQuery? Are there any > comparisons out there? > > >> >> Yeah...that's what I thought. I've never even heard of it before >> WWDC. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Rey Bango >> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 10:29 AM >> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com >> Subject: [jQuery] Re: SproutCore vs jQuery? Are there any >> comparisons out >> there? >> >> >> There are no comparisons out at the moment. While SproutCore has >> recently >> received a lot of press, it's been completely out of the limelight >> otherwise. >> >> Rey... >> >> Andy Matthews wrote: >>> I'm looking for comparisons between the newly popular JS library >>> SproutCore and our own favorite, jQuery. >>> >>> Mostly I'm looking for feature comparisons in the area of data >>> binding >>> and UI. >>> >>> SproutCore's got to be good if Apple decided to use it for their >>> recerntly announced MobileMe online app. But why? Why not jQuery, or >>> Dojo, etc? >>> >>> >>> * >>> ____________________________________ >>> >>> Andy Matthews >>> *Senior ColdFusion Developer >>> >>> Office: 615.627.9747 >>> Fax: 615.467.6249 >>> www.dealerskins.com <http://www.dealerskins.com/> >>> >>> Total customer satisfaction is my number 1 priority! If you are not >>> completely satisfied with the service I have provided, please let me >>> know right away so I can correct the problem, or notify my manager >>> Aaron West at [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >
