I'm finding what seems like a lot of plugins that: a. Don't follow the structure of the 'home page, documentation, demonstration' pattern
b. Have dead links to the code/docs c. Plugins that are marginally 'jqueryized' (for instance a Dynamic Drive component I came across with a minor reference to jquery but the bulk of it's code is run of the mill javascript. d. Seem to be poorly described as to intent/purpose e. Seem to be quickly-knocked-out and/or not well thought out, almost as if for the sake of just getting something published with their name on it. Now I may just be overly critical, since I don't see any discussion on this. But as the plugin list has grown, it's getting more and more difficult to find quality information. Well, there's my 2 cents... Fire away! As a 'well what do you suggest be done about it?' starting point - perhaps a link to 'suggest improvement' that would email the developer or others, could be added? Or a simpler 'does not conform' link that simply marks the plugin project pages as needing cleanup. Perhaps a way for the general community to directly work on the plugins documentation to cleanup the deficiencies? Tough, that one because most link off to someone's personal webspace, I know. Anyway I hope this is taken in the spirit of 'making it better' and not idle griping. I fear jQuery may be getting smothered by it's very success.
