Thanks - and indeed.

I managed to isolate the problem down to

<select name="length">
 ..
</select>

and if I change this to

<select name="lengthYears">
 ..
</select>

then validation happens as I would expect.  Is 'length' an invalid
name for a form element in this context?

Thanks

Michael



On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Jörn Zaefferer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, thats right. Usually the process of extracting already reveals
> the problem to the extractor...
>
> Jörn
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've added some validate() calls now.  I assumed that this wasn't
>> necessary when I explicitly call valid() but perhaps I've got that
>> wrong.  Anyways, it doesn't appear to have changed things.  The valid
>> call on the second form is always returning true (for IE), even if the
>> required fields are empty.  On Firefox it's doing the right thing.
>>
>> When you say extract a testpage, what do you mean?  Remove as much
>> from the page as possible whilst keeping the problem?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Jörn Zaefferer
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I see the "valid" calls in your code, but none where you actually
>>> initialize the validation via $(...).validate().
>>>
>>> Could you extract a testpage?
>>>
>>> Jörn
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi there
>>>>
>>>> I'm having trouble getting the Validation plug in to work on this page
>>>>
>>>> http://dev2.savingforchildren.co.uk/mjs/health/index.epl
>>>>
>>>> I have two forms - the second one appears when the first one is
>>>> successfully completed.
>>>>
>>>> The first form validates correctly (you only need to choose a day,
>>>> month and year from the dropdowns)
>>>>
>>>> However, when using IE no validation is applied to the second form (ie
>>>> you can leave the whole page blank and it is accepted).  Firefox works
>>>> fine
>>>>
>>>> Any help much apprecited
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to