"There probably is a better way to do it. "

Which is what i was getting at......   i hope "honest" isn't/wasn't
taken as "insulting"



On Dec 30, 10:16 pm, "Michael Geary" <m...@mg.to> wrote:
> Come on, MorningZ, there's no need for insults.
>
> But yes, 5000 of those will be pretty slow - and that's before you even
> execute the code inside those functions. How slow? It's easy to test. The
> ready functions are run in the order that the $() functions are called. So
> simply do this in a test page:
>
>     var t1 = +new Date;
>     $(function(){});
>     // ... Repeat above line 5000 times
>     $(function() {
>         var t2 = +new Date;
>         alert( (t2-t1)/1000 + ' seconds' );
>     });
>
> You can easily generate that file by hand in a text editor. You don't have
> to do 5000 pastes. Start with 10 of them, copy that block and paste it 10
> times so you have 100, copy *that* block and paste it 10 times so you have
> 1000, copy that and five more pastes and you're done.
>
> Test it in IE6 (!), and if you're on your usual development machine, triple
> the time from the alert to take into account the slower machines that your
> visitors will have (think a slow laptop running on battery). If you don't
> have IE6, try it in IE7 and as a rough guess, multiply your observed time by
> six (triple for the slow machines, double again for IE6).
>
> Mind if I ask: why do you need 5000 of these? There probably is a better way
> to do it.
>
> -Mike
>
> > From: MorningZ
>
> > If you've got 5000 of those, it's *seriously* time to
> > reconsider your coding techniques.....  depending on that
> > much JavaScript is just plain old stupid......
> > On Dec 30, 8:59 pm, Kean <shenan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Is document ready "actually" an event handler?
>
> > > Let's say I have
>
> > > $(function(){
>
> > > });
>
> > > $(function(){
>
> > > });
>
> > > $(function(){
>
> > > });
>
> > > $(function(){
>
> > > });
>
> > > $(function(){
>
> > > });
>
> > > etc ..... around 5000 of those.
>
> > > Will it actually degrade performance like 5000 bind()?
> > > My guess is not much performance penalty, but again, it's a guess.

Reply via email to