Then what if you just use Class.Extras and all its dependencies as it is? Now that sounds too easy :)
On Jan 23, 9:21 am, Neil Craig <neil.big.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not sure how Mootools 1.2+ is constructed but version 1.11 can > easily be broken into pieces that excludes the parts that extend the > DOM/HTML elements. The files that one should use is: > > Core, Class, Class.Extras, String, Number, Function, Array > > On Jan 21, 11:58 am, Balazs Endresz <balazs.endr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I only heard about this one, looks a bit different from Mootools but > > much smaller:http://www.danwebb.net/2008/1/31/low-pro-for-jquery > > > Though I wonder if it's possible to port the whole Mootools > > implementation to jQuery? You can maybe keep some parts of Core, > > Native and Class, and hack it to work with jQuery ... now that sounds > > like a whole new framework :) > > I don't know Mootools that much at all but maybe it's not as hard as > > it sounds... > > > On Jan 21, 8:18 am, Neil Craig <neil.big.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Bump :) > > > > On Jan 20, 10:36 am, Neil Craig <neil.big.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I was wondering, which Custom Classes Library is best to use along > > > > with jQuery. Up to now, I've been using Mootools to create custom > > > > classes that can be easily extended through its inheritance model. It > > > > also has custom events that I have used extensively. > > > > > Which library do you recommend that has the same functionality as > > > > described above that can co-exist with jQuery peacefully? > > > > > This could make for an interesting discussion....
