Thanks mcologne, appreciated.
On Jan 30, 2:09 pm, mcologne <blueameri...@web.de> wrote: > nice work, i like it! > > without going into details of programming, the site differs from that > classic style often seen > nowadays on many websites... > > you know what i mean... buttons, tabs... > > i like the big graphics in the backgrounds... > > best regards m > cologne > > On Jan 30, 2:38 pm, kim3er <rich...@dogma.co.uk> wrote: > > > Thanks for your feedback. > > > With this project we wanted to create something that was interesting > > to but still functional without reliance on either JS or Flash. The > > end result, I hope, is a website that is functional and fully styled > > without JS turned on. With JS turned on, the site becomes more > > interactive and hopefully more engaging. For users with Flash 9 or > > above, more functionality is exposed, for example music, animated > > tooltips and the red people. What we didn't want was for any of the > > functionality to be dependant on Flash, that's where we draw the line. > > > In hindsight the home page scroll would have been a lot smoother and > > consistent across browsers, if done in Flash. That said, I'm still > > very happy with the result. > > > I'm not sure what you mean by the "background fades" bug, but I have > > discovered the random woman between animations. Thanks again. > > > Rich > > > On Jan 29, 9:33 pm, Ricardo Tomasi <ricardob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I also had that problem. Sometimes I hover a + and it doesn't slide > > > down. Also experiencied two other bugs: > > > - when you click the + button, the background fades from black again > > > - inside a section like 'bar' or 'boutique hotel', when I click > > > another section (gym/pool/etc), an unrelated image flashes in the > > > background (a woman laying back in a chair) > > > > Very nice design. Do you develop in Flash too? Was it worth the extra > > > work to do it all in JS? > > > > cheers, > > > - ricardo > > > > On Jan 29, 6:54 pm, David Meiser <dmei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > It has a nice user experience. However, you might want to think about > > > > the > > > > hoverintent plugin - things seemed "shaky" when I tried to click on > > > > them (eg > > > > - the animation kept moving when I wanted to hover over an item) in FF3. > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:58 PM, kim3er <rich...@dogma.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've just finished working on a new web site using jQuery 1.3.1 and > > > > > would appreciate feedback. > > > > > >http://www.highpointvillage.co.uk/ > > > > > > Rich
