On Feb 4, 11:20 am, brian <bally.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I thought it didn't look right. Even doing it with each() like > that . It's too bad one can't create an Image oject with with both the > dimensions and the src.
Well the other factor is that I want the images to load in succession as opposed to all at once. That way the first image pops in right away, and then people can view the others as they come in instead of waiting for all of them to load before doing anything. On Feb 4, 11:24 am, Liam Potter <radioactiv...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't see the gallery glitch, it probably has more to do with your CPU > speed and RAM then your browser, as it is a large area to apply an > opacity fade too. Is you mother's machine higher spec then yours? I don't think that's it because she has a macbook and I have a 15" Unibody Macbook Pro 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo - 4GB 1067 MHz DDR3. And it has the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT with 256MB if VRAM. My mom's macbook has the Intel GMA 950 with 64MB VRAM So I'm really at a loss to explain it. I'm not sure how it could be a caching issue, and if it is, how to address it.
