"There may be a bit of Apples and Oranges here" For sure.. that link is doing a full blown form post to the server (just pull up Firebug's "Net" panel to see)...... i wouldn't compare anything the two do between each other
I've been using tablesorter for a good year now, and i do everything i can to keep the row count under control, when i can't, i simply use the server to sort On Apr 9, 4:12 pm, csi95 <bmomal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the response -- I may need to do that. > > I'm curious if anyone else has input on the speed of Tablesorter, however. > I've seen other solutions that can sort a large table quickly. For > examplehttp://dynamictable.com/demos/Dynamic Table Demo handles 1,000 rows in > about 1 second. There may be a bit of Apples and Oranges here. Tablesorter > can sort on multiple columns, do zebra striping, etc., so it's more > functional, but 16x slower seems like an unusually large difference. > > I just want to verify that this is normal for tablesorter, and not something > I've done wrong with my implementation of it.... > > Thanks! > > - Bryan > > MorningZ wrote: > > > I'd look at doing some server side sorting if you are looking for > > speed... it's a lot of work for the plugin to sort the client side > > data and then redraw 400 rows of data > > -- > View this message in > context:http://www.nabble.com/tablesorter-Speed-issues-tp22977435s27240p22978... > Sent from the jQuery General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
