On Apr 16, 12:42 am, mkmanning <michaell...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just an FYI, but there's no 'object side' of the json in your example. > It just an object, consisting of name-value pairs. While you can leave No, it is not an object. It is a string. > quotes off of the names, they are strings which, according to the RFC, > should be quoted. Doing so will not cause problems, and will save you > from potentially running into a situation where your name conflicts > with one of the excessive number of reserved words. > > On Apr 15, 7:05 pm, sneaks <deroacheee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > the way i see it, there are quotes on the object side of the json > > where there should be no quotes... That makes about as much sense as something the OP would post. Garrett
- [jQuery] question about dealing with JSON callback sneaks
- [jQuery] Re: question about dealing with JSON callback Scott Sauyet
- [jQuery] Re: question about dealing with JSON callback dhtml
- [jQuery] Re: question about dealing with JSON call... sneaks
- [jQuery] Re: question about dealing with JSON ... dhtml
- [jQuery] Re: question about dealing with J... sneaks
- [jQuery] Re: question about dealing w... sneaks
- [jQuery] Re: question about deali... sneaks
- [jQuery] Re: question about deali... mkmanning
- [jQuery] Re: question about d... dhtml
- [jQuery] Re: question about d... mkmanning
- [jQuery] Re: question about d... Michael Geary
- [jQuery] Re: question about d... mkmanning
- [jQuery] Re: question about d... mkmanning
- [jQuery] Re: question about d... dhtml
- [jQuery] Re: question about d... mkmanning
- [jQuery] Re: question about d... dhtml
- [jQuery] Re: question about dealing with JSON ... Kyle
- [jQuery] Re: question about dealing with J... Rick Faircloth
- [jQuery] Re: question about dealing with J... Donny Kurnia