On Apr 16, 12:42 am, mkmanning <michaell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just an FYI, but there's no 'object side' of the json in your example.
> It just an object, consisting of name-value pairs. While you can leave

No, it is not an object. It is a string.

> quotes off of the names, they are strings which, according to the RFC,
> should be quoted. Doing so will not cause problems, and will save you
> from potentially running into a situation where your name conflicts
> with one of the excessive number of reserved words.
>
> On Apr 15, 7:05 pm, sneaks <deroacheee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > the way i see it, there are quotes on the object side of the json
> > where there should be no quotes...

That makes about as much sense as something the OP would post.

Garrett

Reply via email to