Well it depends ; most of the times you end up loading a big bit of data that should replace a specific portion of the screen (let the standard .load() behaviour do the heavy lifting for this one) plus a few tidbits like notifications and so on that are secondary (can be dealt with in the callback), so your code is just a little bit more expressive (the "main" purpose of the query is expressed first in the .load() mandatory parameters, then the "secondary" tidbits are placed later in the callback). Using .get() would also do the job, but would be slightly less readable later.
Michel Belleville 2009/12/4 Richard D. Worth <rdwo...@gmail.com> > I think you're better of with $.get and then doing the finding and loading > into both divs yourself. > > - Richard > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:21 AM, NMarcu <marcu.nico...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I need to update a div that contain a table, and another one that >> contain a drop down list, that is build depending on what is in one >> table from db(the first div depend on this also). It's possible to >> update the 2 divs with the same load, or need to use two load. I try >> this but not worked correct. >> >> Thanks. >> > >
