I'd just like to throw in my $.02 and say that I also very much like to see js code in the message body. I am also on Gmail and so far the code formatting has been good. I'd like to think that services such as jsbin and JsFiddle will be around forever, but the truth is that they come and go with relative frequency. Earlier today I was reading a Usenet thread from 1985 discussing RMS and his GNU Manifesto. I hope that our list can be maintained with a similar level of integrity.
D On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Asen Bozhilov <asen.bozhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > אריה גלזר <arieh.gla...@gmail.com>: > >> BTW - if any of you find other tools more comfortable - like jsbin - that's >> fine too, my point is t separate code from message > > I am not sure how this is helpful. With Rey we are working on posting > guidelines and of course there will be point about code posting. > > Third parties tool are not good for me. The posted code there can be > expired and this will break consistency of the discussion. I do not > think someone should post ton of code. If he post only the relevant > part it can be easy for the members of group to read and give relevant > responses. > > I agree with Stefan about consistency of the discussion and personally > I prefer code to be a part of a message. > > -- > To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: > http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/ > > To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/ > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jsmentors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jsmentors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
