Which were the latest you used? D!J!X!
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Belle Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 2:36 AM To: JSonar -- JAWS Scripts for Sonar discussion list Subject: Re: [Jsonar] latency in sonar producer 8.5.3 I never experienced issues under xp with the new drivers, but you right, the older ones are rock solid so we know the hardware's great as it always has been, so hopefully they'll do something about this at some point. At 05:50 PM 11/10/2010, you wrote: >Chris, it's there latest drivers altogether that need improving, the >same crackle issues I describe happen on xp with the newer drivers, not >the older ones though... Unfortunately those older drivers won't work >on windows7, so no luck there. > >D!J!X! > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of Chris Belle >Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:56 PM >To: JSonar -- JAWS Scripts for Sonar discussion list >Subject: Re: [Jsonar] latency in sonar producer 8.5.3 > >That's interesting that you had latency issues with the delta cards, >these are internal cards, and typically have better latency than any of >the firewire interfaces, that's been my experience. > >The new drivers control pannels are a bit more challenging, but under >xp and the old drivers you get very good access and very good performance. > >Older technology, but tried and true, I've had my delta's on many pcs >with no problems. > >YOu should use asio on older machines, and with wdm on newer ones, I've >been able to get under 1 ms latency with good performance. > >That's pushing it, I typically loosen it up a bit to 3 ms and or 5 with >large projects, which is still way ahead of many firewire and >especially usb interfaces. > >Since these are industry standard pci interfaces, the chipset issues >shouldn't be as much of a sticking point, though of course with any >daw, your motherboard and supporting subsystems will matter. > >One reason why these cards are still being made and have lasted the >test of time. > >M-audio does need to improve their w7 drivers though. > >But they seem to be very lazy in this regard with many of their >products lately. > > > >At 03:43 AM 11/10/2010, you wrote: > >If you can afford it, I would suggest you change sound card. I > >recently (as of March 2010) changed my delta 66 card which I have had for over 11 years. > >It served me well in the past, however as I started to get into more > >heavy audio works, the latency issue whether in ASIO or not became unacceptable. > >It simply became time to change to something else for that purpose. I > >believe they suggest to set something in the audio section to "safe" > >in ASIO, however this setting seemed to be unchangeable. I am now > >using focusrite pro 24 dsp which was recommended by Phil and I am > >very very happy with it. > >Thx, > >Nicki D > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf > >Of anthony tom studio > >Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:41 PM > >To: 'JSonar -- JAWS Scripts for Sonar discussion list' > >Subject: Re: [Jsonar] latency in sonar producer 8.5.3 > >Sensitivity: Personal > > > >Sound interface? A delta 66. > > > >Anthony D, Tom > >live messinger > >[email protected] > >skype > >stormintom > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf > >Of D!J!X! > >Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 4:43 PM > >To: 'JSonar -- JAWS Scripts for Sonar discussion list' > >Subject: Re: [Jsonar] latency in sonar producer 8.5.3 > >Sensitivity: Personal > > > >What interface are you using? > > > >D!J!X! > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf > >Of anthony tom studio > >Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 3:35 PM > >To: JSonar -- JAWS Scripts for Sonar list > >Subject: [Jsonar] latency in sonar producer 8.5.3 > >Sensitivity: Personal > > > >Hi, how do I deal with the issue of all that latency in sonar? I'm > >running sonar 8.5.3, windows7 32bit, and jaws 11. That's all I can say. Processor: > >Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU E5300 @ 2.60GHz 2.60 GHz > >And Installed memory (RAM): 2.00 GB > >What shall I do in order to deal with this? > > > >Many thanks. > > > >Anthony D, Tom > >Trinidad and Tobago. > >TNT! the home of calypso and steelband. > >e-mail > >[email protected] > >live messinger > >[email protected] > >skype > >stormintom > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org. > > > >Jsonar mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org. > > > >Jsonar mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org. > > > >Jsonar mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org. > > > >Jsonar mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org > > > > > WARNING!!! > >This email could contain innocent phrases which, if taken out of >context, or read from an existing inclination to be hostile, or an >overly politically correct world view could induce cursing, abusive >language, or other indications of less than desirable behavior in a >public venue. >No ill will is intended. >The sender takes no responsibility for mis-interpretation or otherwise >extrapolated extended meaning, intent, or purposes implied or imagined >from said phrases. >The receiver of any such email containing such phrases is solely >responsible for good interpretation and intelligent deployment of >subsequent responses to the above communication. > > >_______________________________________________ >Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org. > >Jsonar mailing list >[email protected] >http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org > > >_______________________________________________ >Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org. > >Jsonar mailing list >[email protected] >http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org WARNING!!! This email could contain innocent phrases which, if taken out of context, or read from an existing inclination to be hostile, or an overly politically correct world view could induce cursing, abusive language, or other indications of less than desirable behavior in a public venue. No ill will is intended. The sender takes no responsibility for mis-interpretation or otherwise extrapolated extended meaning, intent, or purposes implied or imagined from said phrases. The receiver of any such email containing such phrases is solely responsible for good interpretation and intelligent deployment of subsequent responses to the above communication. _______________________________________________ Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org. Jsonar mailing list [email protected] http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org _______________________________________________ Find JSonar and Sonar FAQs, articles, guides and downloads at jsonar.org. Jsonar mailing list [email protected] http://jsonar.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonar_jsonar.org
