Jakob,
A lot of the popular sites don't use frames these days, but sometimes they
have a purpose. I bet the comp.infosystems.www newsgroups have discussed
this many times. Try searching Deja.com at
http://www.deja.com/home_ps.shtml for archived thoughts.
Dan
> ----------
> From: Jakob Ramskov[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: Jakob Ramskov
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 4:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: frame-set's or one frame via SSI/templates ?
>
> What is most popular use out there on the big wide internet, when using
> web applications (and dynamic content).
>
> To use html frames or to only have one frame (that is assembled via.
> SSI/templates).
>
> I see plus and minus for both. frames are complicated, and it's hard to
> tell which frame to display server responses in, since server has no clue
> of the frames. one frame on the other hand causes the entire browser
> canvas to reload for every request, and that may be rough on the
> bandwidth? or is caching still possible with that solution?
>
> Hope to hear about what you've used.
>
> - Jakob
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
FAQs on JSP can be found at:
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
