An 'all code' JSP sounds kind of backwards -- why define objects in a
servlet? I wouldn't define Objects or methods in a jsp when a class can be
defined to contain them. Even smaller systems benefit from this design.
-----Original Message-----
From: JavierG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Model 2, replacing servlet with an "all-code" JSP?
Hi out there:
When using Model 2, can't I replace the servlet used as controller for an
"all-code" JSP, that is, a JSP that begins with <% and ends with %> and no
HTML or out statements whatsoever? My point is that coding that way could be
easier and faster (much less typing) being as they are a lot of objects
predefined and the main parts of the servlet to whish the JSP is translated
being automatically generated by the JSP engine. Any drawbacks to this
approach? Any comments, ideas, critics, etc, would be greatly
appreciated...
J.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
JSP-INTEREST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
