I'll tell you a story.. I have to use this approach now as the site I'm at
put all of their business logic or most of it into an abstract HttpJspPage
subclass. Actually to top if off it's a subclass of Oracle's HttpJspPage and
it's service method which I wanted to override in my servlet as a subclass
of this class is defined as final and the class by definition has to be
declared abstract so I cannot just create an instance helper in my servlet
and use the existing functionality. so for now i've created a "controller"
JSP who simply handles logic. Given the time constraints this project is
under there's no time to go back to refactor things where they should be. So
far the code in the JSP file is still maintainable but I dislike having to
use a JSP where a servlet is much more appropriate.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and reference
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Madigan, Brian
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 9:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Model 2, replacing servlet with an "all-code" JSP?
>
>
> An 'all code' JSP sounds kind of backwards -- why define objects in a
> servlet? I wouldn't define Objects or methods in a jsp when a class can be
> defined to contain them. Even smaller systems benefit from this design.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JavierG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 10:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Model 2, replacing servlet with an "all-code" JSP?
>
>
> Hi out there:
>
> When using Model 2, can't I replace the servlet used as controller for an
> "all-code" JSP, that is, a JSP that begins with <% and ends with %> and no
> HTML or out statements whatsoever? My point is that coding that
> way could be
> easier and faster (much less typing) being as they are a lot of objects
> predefined and the main parts of the servlet to whish the JSP is
> translated
> being automatically generated by the JSP engine. Any drawbacks to this
> approach? Any comments, ideas, critics, etc,  would be greatly
> appreciated...
>
>   J.
>
> ==================================================================
> =========
> To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
> JSP-INTEREST".
> Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
>
>  http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
>  http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
>  http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
>  http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
>
> ==================================================================
> =========
> To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff
> JSP-INTEREST".
> Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:
>
>  http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
>  http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
>  http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
>  http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets
>

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe: mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: "signoff JSP-INTEREST".
Some relevant FAQs on JSP/Servlets can be found at:

 http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/faq.html
 http://www.esperanto.org.nz/jsp/jspfaq.html
 http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=JSP
 http://www.jguru.com/jguru/faq/faqpage.jsp?name=Servlets

Reply via email to