The issue here, if I understand the comment, is that Harry has a proposed fix and attached patches to the JIRAs and would like one of the committers to review and provide feedback. If the fix appears to be correct, then whoever reviews it could just commit it.

Can anyone look at Harry's patch and commit or comment on it?

Craig

On Apr 12, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Janne Jalkanen wrote:


*shrug* when I decide to fix something, I just pick something and work on it. I don't remember all the issues and whether they have patches or not. I don't certainly go through all the issues first (JIRA is way too slow for that). I can't say what the others do, but that's the way I work.

I guess the only way to get them fixed is to bug the list about them so that people remember that they exist :-)

/Janne

On 12 Apr 2008, at 19:52, Harry Metske wrote:
I understand there are many more open issues, but what I meant is that these three issues have patches attached for quite a while, while all the other
issues have not.

Having the patches not in the base for such a long time requires me to keep changing the patches when sources get changed by other patches. (for example
JSPWIKI-242 is a candidate)

But I might be misunderstanding some things ?

regards,
Harry

2008/4/12, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

They are all tagged for 2.8...  So eventually, yeah.

There are currently 40+ open issues for 2.8 (just went through the
unassigned list). But I am not going through them in any particular order.

/Janne

On Apr 12, 2008, at 18:52 , Harry Metske wrote:

Hi committers,

the jira issues JSPWIKI-10 JSPWIKI-50 and JSPWIKI-100 are planned for
2.8
and have patches attached.
Are there any plans to incorporate these patches ?

regards,
Harry

--
met vriendelijke groet,
Harry Metske
Telnr. +31-548-512395
Mobile +31-6-51898081





--
met vriendelijke groet,
Harry Metske
Telnr. +31-548-512395
Mobile +31-6-51898081


Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to