On 9/23/2011 8:17 AM, Vladimir Avdonin wrote: > Hey, maybe this would be good moment to maybe contemplate on maybe > uhmm... name change?
Actually, when we're on the verge of actually getting control of the domain... that would be the *last* time to contemplate it. :) The time to contemplate it is when Brian has the domain paid up for years and doesn't get back to us... or when a domain-squatter gets a hold of it and wants a lot of money. But, now that you've mentioned it... > JSynthLib sounds like library, not application. For this reason I passed > by it in searches when looking for synth applications. > > How about SynthJ for the first contest entry? I like that it's short, but it's still a little cryptic. I'm thinking that we might want some combination of two words: what it does stuff *with*, and what it *does* with them. Off the top of my head, only two words for each category come to mind: (Sysex|Synth)(Manager|Librarian) And then an optional "J" at the front. So, we could have something like "JSysexManager" (and, yes, I realize that one of the pairings, "JSynthLibrarian", is almost identical to what we have now). Anyway, just a thought. - Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Jsynthlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsynthlib-devel
