On 9/23/2011 11:19 AM, Joachim wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm thinking that we might want some combination of two words: what it > > does stuff *with*, and what it *does* with them. > > most applications have a name that doesn't imply it's use but are catchy, > right? > Gimp, Apache, Tomcat, JBoss, Inkscape, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Gnumeric, ...
Okay. Then I nominate "Blasphemy". :) > I think the catchyness is more important than implying it's use. > SynthJ, JSysexManager or JSynthManager are not really an improvement. > > >> JSynthLib sounds like library, not application. For this reason I passed > >> by it in searches when looking for synth applications. > > That's a point. > > If we start a name context I'll throw in: > - Jones (*J*ava *O*pen source *N*ice *E*ditor and librarian for *S*ysex) > - Jamidiquai > - MIDIthang > - No SysEx till marriage Jones is cool, but we'd NEVER come up on the first page of Google hits. Jamidiquai is fun. - Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Jsynthlib-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsynthlib-devel
