Many thanks for the paper Rory. On first skim it looks very interesting and I'll enjoy studying it further.
cheers Michael 2008/12/16 Rory Plaire <codekai...@gmail.com>: > Hi Michael, > > I don't have a great deal of experience with various R-Trees, and the main > reason for this is the paper on STR R-Trees which shows that they outperform > Hilbert trees by a small but significant margin on a variety of spatial > datasets. > (http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19970016975_1997026099.pdf) > After reading this, I just didn't have interest in them anymore. In my > experience, I've never really seen a Hilbert R-Tree, and I just assumed that > STR trees were the state of the art, and reading the paper cemented this > concept. > > I would be interested in revisiting this, if my assumptions are wrong... > > -rory _______________________________________________ jts-devel mailing list jts-devel@lists.jump-project.org http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
