John and Alan:
> Just an option for two words (Values) would be useful.
> Why?
Our friend malloc(3) allocates buffers that are 2 word aligned.
Therefore:
1 word allocates use 2 words.
2 word allocates use 4 words.
3 word allocates use 4 words
4 word allocates use 6 words, etc.
(The overhead word (that describes the length) is odd word aligned)
Therefore it would be nice if Judy had option for 2 word Values and
not more. The cost of memory that malloc uses does not
justify a larger Value area.
But internally, Judy uses pointers and Values interchangeably.
This would require extensive changes to the code. I am not
sure the cost justifies the return.
Thanks for your interest,
doug
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Judy-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel
