I'm enjoying watching at least a few people on the planet use, discuss, and (sigh) debug libJudy... But seldom have much more to offer.
Doug wrote: > They have implemented a "bulk" JudyLNext() and got big improvements. > I have not had a chance to verify. Tim wrote: > Are you talking about the Judy1SetArray() and JudyLInsArray() > functions that Alan Silverstein wrote? Those aren't applicable to > JudySL, right? Right, The Judy*Array() functions have no SL equivalent (as far as I can recall) because the array-of-array nature of SL made it pointless, wouldn't help performance much. So I'm not sure what "bulk JudyLNext()" Doug's referring to. Cheers, Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Judy-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel
