On 21/11/2012, at 7:10 AM, Schaeferhaus wrote: > > For me the 2 major improvements to judy arrays are: > 1 - Using Judy arrays for non null terminated strings (this is currently a > big drawback). > 2 - Improving performance of the JudySLNext, JudySLPrev by using a cursor > structure as parameter. > The path of the Judy-three and the current string must be stored in > this structure.
And if JduyHS is kept, it has to have a way to scan all elements. Otherwise there's no way to, for example, delete all the objects it holds (other than also keeping a second data structure just for that purpose). -- john skaller [email protected] http://felix-lang.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Judy-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel
