On Jan 7, 2004, at 8:23 PM, Warner Onstine wrote:
Not necessarily. You can write maven plugins using jelly only (and you can use Ant inside of a jelly script as well with little or no changes to the script).
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly
IMO Jelly is a lot easier to use and much more robust than things you will find in Ant. But then again Jelly isn't meant as an Ant replacement.
So, have we started the Maven vs. Ant holy war yet ;-).
So, Maven smartasses... solve Tom's problem with it and quit hand waving about "jelly" this, or POM that :))
Show me the specifics!
Erik
Don't look at me! I explicitly said (and now I'm glad I did) that it could be a wash, and I don't know jelly. I just like my autogenerated site with all the cool reports. :)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
