On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:31 AM, John Arbash Meinel <j...@arbash-meinel.com> wrote: > I would probably avoid putting such an emphasis on "any machine can be > a manager machine". But that is my personal opinion. (If you want HA > you probably want it on dedicated nodes.)
Resource waste holds juju back for the small users. Being able to share a state server with other resources does sound attractive from that perspective. It may be the difference between running 3 machines or 6. > I would probably also remove the machine if the only thing on it was > the management. Certainly that is how people want us to do "juju > remove-unit". If there are other units in the same machine, we should definitely not remove the machine on remove-unit. The principle sounds the same with state servers. > The main problem with this is that it feels slightly too easy to add > just 1 machine and then not actually have HA (mongo stops allowing > writes if you have a 2-node cluster and lose one, right?) +1 gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
