On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Eric Snow <eric.s...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:32 PM, David Cheney > <david.che...@canonical.com> wrote: >> There were three problem reviewboard was supposed to address, review >> comments are sent immediately, no side by side diffs, and no way to to >> chained proposals. > > It will be worth being extra clear on ReviewBoard's pros and cons. > I'll open a new thread. > >> >> I think that over the last few months we've all learnt to live with >> the first issue > > I for one haven't. On several occasions I have made a comment that I > later realized was not valid, but am not able to simply remove since > it already sent. > >> >> On the second, github now does nice side by side diffs. > > Agreed. > >> >> On the third, it appears reviewboard leaves you solidly to your own >> devices to implement chained proposals. > > rbt supports it just fine and reviewboard itself supports it (see the > "Depends on" field on every review request). What support did you > have in mind?
Ian and Tim want whatever they had with launchpad. I never used lp like that so I never felt the loss; I just propose one branch at a time and have others waiting in the wings that I can propose as soon as the predecessor lands. > > -eric -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
