On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Kapil Thangavelu <kapil.thangav...@canonical.com> wrote:
> first as you say its people first experience with juju and the way its > deployment usage fits very well with some folks production needs ( ie. i > have a big machine in the corner and juju can deploy workloads on it). I > think the issue primarily is that of implementation, and the mindset among > developers/implementers that we don't support it. > > Most of the reasons why its different on an implementation level disappear > with lxd, at which point we should support it for dev and prod. Do you mean local-provider would be less devel/demo if the state-server was place in a container (machine-0) instead of co-opting localhost to be machine-0? -- Curtis Hovey Canonical Cloud Development and Operations http://launchpad.net/~sinzui -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
