+1 for different default configs by environment. I consider this issue a big block for new charmers Em 16/08/2015 19:03, "Mark Shuttleworth" <m...@ubuntu.com> escreveu:
> On 14/08/15 04:56, Stuart Bishop wrote: > > I've discussed similar things with regard to the PostgreSQL charm and > > autotuning, with the decision being that charm defaults should be set > > so things 'just work' in a development environment. > > Yes, charm defaults should be efficient for rapid iteration and > development. > > Iteration and development scenarios are, as Stub points out, orders of > magnitude more common than production scenarios. > > In future, we might designate whole environments as dev, test or > production, so that charms could auto-tune differently. > > Mark > > > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
