On 13 November 2015 at 15:02, Matthew Williams <matthew.willi...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, Sunitha, > > My apologies, I should have included the explanation in the original email. > > This was a change to address a long standing bug: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1174610
Ah - I must have been remembering the older behaviour. I remember being surprised that destroy-service didn;t reset unit numbering previously - I hadn't realised it had been changed in the mean time. > There's a discussion in the bug report, but the summary is that in most > cases it's desirable to have the unit id be unique across the life of an > environment. Otherwise you loose the identity of a unit across relations. This makes sense to me. Thanks -- Simon -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
